Sunday, January 27, 2013

PEER-REVIEWED VS. NON–PEER-REVIEWED

By Matt Stone QHCusa 2013


Importance of Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Journals
As scholar-practitioners for academic and professional success it is important for us as scholar-practitioners to understand the concepts and principles of peer-reviewed journals for effective public health communication.  Peer-reviewed journals are  about the validity of evidence based research that is both non biased and addresses the gaps of current research, more important, builds upon critical thinking skill needed for logic, reasoning and common-sense for a target audience and a credible conclusion  (Harman, 2008, p.1).
Peer-Reviewed Research and Professional Health Communications
Peer-reviewed research is important to the study and application of public health communication because, peer review literature promotes a scholarly voice within the field of study, promotes academic integrity and intervention sustainability that is important to the confidence of the reader audience.  Peer-reviewed research and professional health communication is structured to provide evidence based research that is both nonbiased and addresses the gaps within current research for future research.  Ratzan (2005) endorsed that “health communication is a vital life line for promoting good health and the application of health intervention communication principles for the quality health of individuals and communities.
Use of Non-Peer-Reviewed Articles
Walden University (2012, para. 3) cites that the use of non-peer-reviewed articles is only useful when we as researchers attempt to “gather information about a specific topic under research review and to find other sources from the references. However, it is the original and primary research that should be relied on most heavily in demonstrating scholarship, depth, and validation of factual information (para.  3).
References:
Harman, G (2008). Physical science and common-sense psychology. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/~harman/Papers/Sehon.pdf
Ratzan, S. C. (2005). The practitioner's connection to health communication research. Journal of Health Communication, 9, (6). Retrieved from http://www.gwu.edu/~cih/journal/
Walden University. (2012). Introduction to scholarly writing: Plagiarism and academic integrity. Retrieved from www.Waldenu.edu. 



No comments:

Post a Comment